HXR for Journalists

Human Experience Reform (HXR) offers journalists a developing framework for examining how institutions consume or preserve human time, attention, and effort; constrain or support agency; affect safety, health, and opportunity; and recognize or disregard human dignity through their treatment of people.

A project engineering its methods in public

HXR began in 2026 under its original name, User Experience Reform (UXR), by documenting a framework. It then moved into engineering and testing that framework in public and now accepts limited real-world submissions in Private Alpha. Outside sandboxed regression tests, its casework uses real experiences and records rather than invented case stories.

The project has reached this stage without a formal programming team, board of directors, or dedicated domain. That makes the development path unusual, but not self-validating. The more consequential fact is inspectability: HXR now has a bounded intake process, evidence and correction records, proposition provenance, release gates, a private regression ledger, and public changelog entries that record failures as well as additions.

What the first intake test found

The first 12-fixture manual baseline produced eight passes and four failures, so the suite failed overall. It was manual, single-grader, self-graded, and sequential. No executable publication broker was in the decision path. HXR therefore does not claim that broker enforcement has been validated or that the failed suite passed.

The observed defect led to fail-closed candidate/source-resolution records, a no-manufactured-attribution invariant, authoritative result linkage, idempotent write identities, a frozen v1 specification, and draft successor coverage. Fixture scenarios, acceptance criteria, prohibited constructions, and document-to-test mappings remain private so the benchmark cannot be reverse-engineered.

What journalists can examine

• whether public cases stay bounded to the evidence actually supplied;
• whether source attribution preserves testimony without turning it into independently established fact;
• whether organizations are distinguished from departments, products, mechanisms, and service pathways;
• whether private intake remains separate from public publication;
• whether HXR corrects its own records visibly;
• whether positive performance and verified reform receive the same evidentiary discipline as failures;
• whether readiness language matches what has actually been tested.

Potential story areas

• small public-interest infrastructure built before a formal organization exists;
• engineering and testing an AI-assisted intake process in public;
• organizations reporting efficiency while transferring work onto customers, patients, workers, or the public;
• formal rights that cannot be exercised in practice;
• systems that make correction harder than the original transaction;
• organizations that measurably improve and return time or agency to people.

Current limits

HXR does not yet have a mature or representative case database, validated automated broker, staffed public intake service, operational Blue Score, or broad scientific validation. Private Alpha submissions are limited, and publication remains a separate human-gated process.

How journalists can contribute

Journalists can inspect whether HXR overstates evidence, identify missing domains, contribute public records or reporting methods, challenge governance and privacy assumptions, and point to reforms or institutional responses that deserve documentation. Participation in review does not automatically enroll anyone's experience into a public case.

Live HXR Cases · Complete HXR Reviewer Packet · Current Project Status · Contributing to HXR · Development Changelog